Comments on: Leica M6 versus auto-exposure M7 https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/ Leica cameras, photography and discussion Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:10:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: Mike Evans https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-56398 Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:10:31 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-56398 In reply to thomas draschan.

I too like the M7. To reverse an analogy, it is a digital M without a sensor. Works in exactly the same way and is a painless transition to film for, say, an M11 ussr. But you are right in the battery issue. The new M6 is probably the sweet spot for a new film camera. I am not one to buy a limited edition and put it on the shelf for ten years. Better to buy a series camera and use it!

]]>
By: thomas draschan https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-56397 Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:22:14 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-56397 In reply to David Harrison-Rand.

I have been using mine extensively. every day. it ate so many batteries that I sold it, because I used to run out on trails & travels. seems to be different with different cameras… I liked the M7 most of all leicas. looking at the price of the cameras it seems best tu buy a ltd edition of some titanium mechanical camera, not unpack it & sell it 10 years later. meanwhile I use medium format. even the best 35mm lens can’t match MF quality. there are super cheap 4×45 by fuji, for some more money on can get 67 which is amazing even by digital standards.

]]>
By: Mike Evans https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-9838 Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:21:44 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-9838 In reply to David Harrison-Rand.

Subjectively, the battery problem is most noticeable if the camera is not used for a time. I use my M7 sparingly and I have found battery problems. If, as in your case, you are using it all the time the batteries seem to last longer. Strange.

]]>
By: David Harrison-Rand https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-9765 Mon, 11 Mar 2019 23:10:22 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-9765 I’ve had my M7 for almost 3 years now and I haven’t had to change the batteries yet. I’ve put about 50 rolls of film through the camera in that time.

My M10 on the other hand only gets about a day of shooting on a battery.

]]>
By: Mike Evans https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5422 Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:14:06 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5422 In reply to Michael Kay.

Yes, you are right. I’ve had good relationships with the M2 as well as the M3 and M4 (but not the M5 which I have not had the pleasure of trying). As you realise, however, this article was looking at M cameras with built-in light metering which some people do prefer. But enjoy the M2, it is probably a more sensible buy than the M-A.

]]>
By: William Fagan https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5419 Thu, 19 Apr 2018 07:47:38 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5419 For me, the best film M was the M3. I have all of the film Ms up to and including the M7 except for the M6TTL. I prefer the M6 to the M7 as it seems smaller and nicer in the hand, but, for me, the viewfinder in the M3 trumps all others. It is all about personal preferences, of course.

I have seen some rangefinder flare in some models, but nothing that would bother me. I have not seen any in the wonderful M3 viewfinder.

William

]]>
By: Michael Kay https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5418 Wed, 18 Apr 2018 22:39:25 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5418 I have an M-A with a light meter. Mine only cost £850 and is just like new. I think this is because they wrote M2 on the top instead of M-A.

]]>
By: Claus https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5417 Wed, 18 Apr 2018 19:31:15 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5417 I am very well aware that the aforementioned issues exist, but my experiences differ somewhat.
E.g. I never had a (digital) M-camera for a simple clean- and adjust-job more than two weeks in the hands of Leica customer care (and I did that fairly often over the years, with M9, M240 or M10). But maybe that’s a kind of home-advantage, being on German soil.
Then – call it luck – no sensor flare at all (that I’m aware of). And btw, I enjoy shooting my M6 parallel to my M10 just as well. Even if I have to set shutter speed manually on the M6 it’s very much the same ergonomics. Let’s forget about the fact that occasionally I search for the monitor on a very bland backside of the M6 and/or for the film advance lever on the M10…

]]>
By: Mike Evans https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5421 Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:41:58 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5421 In reply to Mark.

You could be right on the investment front. It’s just that you can have a lot of fun without much, if any, depreciation — all other issues set aside.

]]>
By: Mike Evans https://www.macfilos.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5420 Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:40:47 +0000 http://worcesterwordpress.com/2018/04/18/2018-4-10-leica-m6-versus-auto-exposure-m7/#comment-5420 In reply to Brian Nicol.

Both yours and Wayne’s points are well made. For sheer pleasure and economy, an old OM-1 would do just as well. I don’t do a lot of film, partly because I am too lazy to do my own processing, but mainly because everything I take tends to be time-sensitive — needing to get it on the blog as soon as possible. But I would really like to spend more time shooting the M7, M6 and the others.

]]>